{"id":1597,"date":"2024-04-08T09:14:41","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T16:14:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/elementary.sd42.ca\/highlandpark\/?page_id=1597"},"modified":"2024-04-08T09:14:41","modified_gmt":"2024-04-08T16:14:41","slug":"playground-survey","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/elementary.sd42.ca\/highlandpark\/playground-survey\/","title":{"rendered":"Playground Survey"},"content":{"rendered":"

Please select your preferred language in the top-right corner of this webpage to translate this page.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Below is a copy of the Highland Park Elementary survey<\/a>, including a list of pros and cons for a phased<\/span> and whole<\/span> playground purchase. The survey will close at 4 p.m. on Monday, April 22, 2024. Survey results and next steps will be shared with Highland Park Elementary families by email (through the Parent Portal) and on the school website.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

Survey Question<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Please indicate if your household prefers a PHASED or WHOLE approach to playground replacement:<\/strong><\/p>\n

PHASED<\/strong><\/span> (purchasing\/replacing one item at a time as funds are raised)
\nWHOLE<\/strong><\/span> (purchasing\/replacing the whole playground once\u00a0all funds<\/span> are raised)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Take the survey at https:\/\/www.surveymonkey.com\/r\/7VNJJPG<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Survey Purpose<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The purpose of this survey is to give every Highland Park Elementary family an opportunity to clearly state their household\u2019s preference on the progression of the playground project.<\/p>\n

Specifically, you will be asked whether you support a PHASED<\/strong><\/span> implementation of playground improvements (purchasing one item at a time as funds are raised), or if you would prefer to wait until the all the funds are raised before the WHOLE<\/strong><\/span> playground is replaced.<\/p>\n

Background Information<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Before voting, consider the pros and cons of both approaches, as noted below.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n

PHASED <\/strong>APPROACH<\/span><\/h4>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Immediate Benefits<\/strong>: Current Highland Park Elementary students get to enjoy new playground elements as they are installed.<\/li>\n
  2. Ongoing Engagement:<\/strong> Visible progress can help maintain community interest and ongoing fundraising momentum.<\/li>\n
  3. Flexibility:<\/strong> The school can adjust plans for future phases based on changing needs and feedback on earlier installations.<\/li>\n
  4. Grant Eligibility:<\/strong> Demonstrates active progress, which might be required for certain grants and additional funding.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Cons: <\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Higher Overall Cost: <\/strong>Incremental purchasing and construction could be more expensive due to repeated setups and installation fees.<\/li>\n
    2. Design Inconsistency:<\/strong> There is a risk of design discontinuity if earlier installed elements become outdated or are no longer available.<\/li>\n
    3. Operational Disruption:<\/strong> Frequent construction phases may disrupt school activities and access to play areas.<\/li>\n
    4. Maintenance Overlap:<\/strong> Maintenance costs may start accruing for initial elements while fundraising and construction are still ongoing.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

       <\/p>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      WHOLE <\/strong>APPROACH<\/span><\/h4>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

      Pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Cohesive Design: <\/strong>Ensures all playground elements are from the same series, providing a consistent look and user experience.<\/li>\n
      2. Cost Efficiency:<\/strong> Potential for cost savings through bulk purchasing and a single installation process.<\/li>\n
      3. Singular Construction Effort:<\/strong> Minimizes disruption by completing construction in one effort rather than in multiple phases.<\/li>\n
      4. Immediate Full Use:<\/strong> Upon completion, the entire playground is available for all students, offering a wide variety of activities.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Delayed Gratification:<\/strong> It may take several years before any new playground elements are available for children to enjoy. The time to raise necessary funds can range from 2 to 10 years.<\/li>\n
        2. Fundraising Challenges:<\/strong> A larger sum may seem daunting, potentially discouraging donors and prolonging fundraising efforts.<\/li>\n
        3. Risk of Inflation:<\/strong> Costs may increase due to inflation, potentially requiring even greater funds than initially projected.<\/li>\n
        4. Potential Loss of Momentum:<\/strong> With a long-term goal, it\u2019s possible to lose community interest and momentum in fundraising.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

           <\/p>\n\n\n\n
          \n

          OTHER <\/strong>CONSIDERATIONS<\/span><\/h4>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n